1. You're extremely rich.
2. You see it as a learning opportunity or you enjoy helping, without thought of financial reward.
What will happen, at the slightest whiff of success, is that professional investors and VC will swoop in at a moments notice, and dilute you to pieces.
In the end, you will have paid for the company while it was small, to get it started, and then the VC:s will snatch it away by diluting you. Hence nr 1 above, but be prepared to spend!
> if a VC investor is doing their job well, they will make sure to keep investing in your company until they have a good amount of ownership. This means it is against their incentives to introduce you to other investors or do anything else that interferes with their ability to buy more shares in your company for a good price.
this is only true for larger multi-stage funds who compete with each other, not for Seed or Series A-only funds
Yeah. In my experience investors in the early rounds are eager to do introductions because they’re still seeking to validate the investment internally.
If they led a pre-seed, they’d be happy to see someone else lead the seed round because then it’s easier to make the case within the fund that they should maintain or increase their stake.
External validation means a lot when the company is young.
Yes, it's completely backwards really. In most successful companies, a VC's holdings are likely to decrease over time, not increase, as the company raises more money and existing investors are diluted. And investors are (in general) motivated to introduce you to new later stage investors because it increases the value of their holdings, even when diluted.
I like this in general but I think it’s sad the friends and family who helped you don’t get any financial upside.
I also take issue with calling this angel investing:
> I angel invest primarily through my scouting relationship with the VC firm Andreesson Horowitz. They give me a budget for investing in each fund and I get a fraction of the carry.
Full agree. This is... just being a VC. If it's not your own money and you're aligning with someone else's thesis, you're just a vc with crappier terms
Later on it looks like he classifies him as a "vanity angel" rather than a "strategic angel." It sounds like it can be useful to have someone with name recognition as an investor when you're talking to people who aren't very familiar with the space.
if you are trying to convince people to invest on name recognition vs. knowledge of your space, or ability to move the company forward it doesn't seem like a great guide for getting angels: "be lucky and get someone famous with lots of money".
He's a retired pro basketball player. He's since made early investments in companies like Hugging Face[1], Coinbase, and Robinhood.[2] If you earn millions in your 20s, didn't spend it, and have a killer work ethic, you can flip careers to professional investor.
He's an hall of fame basketball player who has made a shit-ton of money, drafted after one year of collge with a team of bankers investing his money, he's definitely not "hustling two jobs" simultaneously. The semi-remarkable thing is he hasn't blown his wealth on gambling or pet sharks.
If it were that easy, the norm wouldn't be blowing the wealth on gambling or pet sharks lol.
If he has successfully assembled a team of bankers that has been as successful as his portfolio suggests, while allowing him to be completely hands off, the man clearly has talents beyond the basketball court.
Unrelated to article, but I had a call with Jean when she was running Akita pre-acquisition, and she was so thorough and thoughtful. We didn't end up buying Akita for various reasons, but I remember walking away thinking, this person can not fail.
> Elad was elusive but the angel who was most consistently influential and supportive during my entire five-year run at Akita. We had a fifteen-minute call almost every quarter, sometimes at an unpredictable time, but always full of great guidance.
How helpful can a person who spends less than 5 hours over 5 YEARS be? How much time are they even spending learning / thinking about the company?
In the spirit of finding the right person through serendipity:
I’m actively looking for intros to angels who are interested in B2B lending. The tariffs have completely disrupted the US SMB lending ecosystem and automation is going to have to ramp up rapidly to close the gap.
Myself and my team have a AI automation tool, we are revenue generating, technical founding team with 2x maths PhDs
Please email me (email in profile) if relevant to someone you know
I see the crux of this post is that they gave a lot of valuable advice to someone who was, at the time, inexperienced. Surely you can acquire sage advice without giving up equity by just hiring someone with experience. And they'd be onboard full-time instead of 15 minutes a quarter. It seems to me the biggest value is the obvious one. That they give you money.
And sorry for opening a political can of worms, but I wouldn't touch anything that touches Andreesen with a 10 foot pole at this point. He's taken a serious heel turn and is openly endorsing Fascism.
>> I told him I wanted investment from Kevin Durant. It was fall 2018, KD was playing for the Warriors, and he had won Finals MVP earlier that year. I was a KD fan and had heard he did tech investing.
So you skipped a friend or family member because KD is good at basketball and has lots of money? Super "field guide" /s
Stay away from the Angel investor game unless:
1. You're extremely rich. 2. You see it as a learning opportunity or you enjoy helping, without thought of financial reward.
What will happen, at the slightest whiff of success, is that professional investors and VC will swoop in at a moments notice, and dilute you to pieces.
In the end, you will have paid for the company while it was small, to get it started, and then the VC:s will snatch it away by diluting you. Hence nr 1 above, but be prepared to spend!
> if a VC investor is doing their job well, they will make sure to keep investing in your company until they have a good amount of ownership. This means it is against their incentives to introduce you to other investors or do anything else that interferes with their ability to buy more shares in your company for a good price.
this is only true for larger multi-stage funds who compete with each other, not for Seed or Series A-only funds
Yeah. In my experience investors in the early rounds are eager to do introductions because they’re still seeking to validate the investment internally.
If they led a pre-seed, they’d be happy to see someone else lead the seed round because then it’s easier to make the case within the fund that they should maintain or increase their stake.
External validation means a lot when the company is young.
Yes, it's completely backwards really. In most successful companies, a VC's holdings are likely to decrease over time, not increase, as the company raises more money and existing investors are diluted. And investors are (in general) motivated to introduce you to new later stage investors because it increases the value of their holdings, even when diluted.
Do you have a portfolio or any direct experience to share? It seems the author is speaking from experience.
Many funds only invest in a few rounds. The $10M micro VC that participated in your seed round isn’t making a dent in your $100M D raise.
Syndicates are much stronger than a sole VC leading everything. There’s just way more capital and help with a syndicate.
I like this in general but I think it’s sad the friends and family who helped you don’t get any financial upside.
I also take issue with calling this angel investing:
> I angel invest primarily through my scouting relationship with the VC firm Andreesson Horowitz. They give me a budget for investing in each fund and I get a fraction of the carry.
Full agree. This is... just being a VC. If it's not your own money and you're aligning with someone else's thesis, you're just a vc with crappier terms
Well, sounds like a VC but without a good bit of the stress and hassle. Like you wouldnt have to gin up money from LPs
That’s what angel investing is.
Instead with this strategy you get a whopping 5% of profits and Andreessen gets 95% for your efforts / network.
Yeh this is more like being a salesman selling funding contracts for a VC firm to startups, a weird dynamic.
May we all have this man’s network
> Martin and Mike both advised strategic angels instead of friends and family to fill out the round, so that’s what we did.
How is Kevin Durant (pro basketball player) a strategic angel for a monitoring/observability company?
Later on it looks like he classifies him as a "vanity angel" rather than a "strategic angel." It sounds like it can be useful to have someone with name recognition as an investor when you're talking to people who aren't very familiar with the space.
if you are trying to convince people to invest on name recognition vs. knowledge of your space, or ability to move the company forward it doesn't seem like a great guide for getting angels: "be lucky and get someone famous with lots of money".
He's a retired pro basketball player. He's since made early investments in companies like Hugging Face[1], Coinbase, and Robinhood.[2] If you earn millions in your 20s, didn't spend it, and have a killer work ethic, you can flip careers to professional investor.
Idk why nobody's done a good feature on him.
[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/kevin-durant-investment-portf...
[2] https://parlemag.com/2025/04/kevin-durant-business-ventures/
I'm not questioning his investment abilities, just curious what he offers that is strategic (advice, dealmaking, etc).
Aside: Saquon Barkley's (pro football player) portfolio is insane https://www.readtheprofile.com/p/saquon-barkley-investment-p...
The ability of your enterprise sales team to invite a $50M deal prospect to a luxury box with Kevin Durant is not to be underestimated.
Not retired (plays for Houston) but doesn’t lessen your point one bit.
lol that's egg on my face. I just assumed he wouldn't be working two full time jobs at once.
That's wild.
He's an hall of fame basketball player who has made a shit-ton of money, drafted after one year of collge with a team of bankers investing his money, he's definitely not "hustling two jobs" simultaneously. The semi-remarkable thing is he hasn't blown his wealth on gambling or pet sharks.
If it were that easy, the norm wouldn't be blowing the wealth on gambling or pet sharks lol.
If he has successfully assembled a team of bankers that has been as successful as his portfolio suggests, while allowing him to be completely hands off, the man clearly has talents beyond the basketball court.
A good feature wouldn't call KD a retired NBA player yet :)
Low time burden, low emotional burden, unlikely to interfere or micromanage?
Unrelated to article, but I had a call with Jean when she was running Akita pre-acquisition, and she was so thorough and thoughtful. We didn't end up buying Akita for various reasons, but I remember walking away thinking, this person can not fail.
If you don't want to lose your money, don't become an angel investor.
> Elad was elusive but the angel who was most consistently influential and supportive during my entire five-year run at Akita. We had a fifteen-minute call almost every quarter, sometimes at an unpredictable time, but always full of great guidance.
How helpful can a person who spends less than 5 hours over 5 YEARS be? How much time are they even spending learning / thinking about the company?
Good guide.
In the spirit of finding the right person through serendipity:
I’m actively looking for intros to angels who are interested in B2B lending. The tariffs have completely disrupted the US SMB lending ecosystem and automation is going to have to ramp up rapidly to close the gap.
Myself and my team have a AI automation tool, we are revenue generating, technical founding team with 2x maths PhDs
Please email me (email in profile) if relevant to someone you know
How to win the lottery, a field guide.
Not really anything actionable there.
Kevin Hartz is the most desirable angel in the valley IMO. His advice and generosity with his time is unparalleled.
Great post. She applies her analytical CS thinking to the angel process.
Fascinating. I guess people go through this in different ways. Don’t know any startup founders who took a path with this structure.
Ultimately she did exit to Postman so whatever she did was successful though of course one cannot cargo cult everything.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36787860
I see the crux of this post is that they gave a lot of valuable advice to someone who was, at the time, inexperienced. Surely you can acquire sage advice without giving up equity by just hiring someone with experience. And they'd be onboard full-time instead of 15 minutes a quarter. It seems to me the biggest value is the obvious one. That they give you money.
And sorry for opening a political can of worms, but I wouldn't touch anything that touches Andreesen with a 10 foot pole at this point. He's taken a serious heel turn and is openly endorsing Fascism.
>> I told him I wanted investment from Kevin Durant. It was fall 2018, KD was playing for the Warriors, and he had won Finals MVP earlier that year. I was a KD fan and had heard he did tech investing.
So you skipped a friend or family member because KD is good at basketball and has lots of money? Super "field guide" /s